GMAT写作七宗罪的记忆方法：因、果、证上百万浏览！ - ┈┋绝杀一尾区┋┈ - 万众海浪论坛万众六合|权威论坛|六合高手堂|万人六合堂|万人资料堂|万众图库堂|万众彩色图库|心水社区|直播亚视|亚视在线|本港台直播|开奖直播|开奖系统|全网最快！

滨葆颖

中级会员

UID 185495
精华 0
积分 380
帖子 76
威望 380 点
金钱 1530 RMB
阅读权限 30
注册 2017-7-11
状态离线

大中小

使用道具

发表于 2017-7-14 03:40 资料个人空间短消息加为好友

GMAT写作七宗罪的记忆方法：因、果、证上百万浏览！

GMAT写作七宗罪的记忆方法：因、果、证上百万浏览小学生爱国标语！
GMAT写作七宗罪的记忆方法3月思想汇报：因、果、证上百万浏览！
来源：GMAT备考2017-04-21 19:03点击量：
【MBA中国网讯】分析了两个晚上的GMAT AA，发现“GMAT七宗罪”确实是好东西丁字裤子美女图片，就是那些“罪”太多、而且过于零散，很难记忆销魂美女。因此将七宗罪分类整理了一下火车票改签新规定，按照论证的原因、结果、论证过程三部分，归为三个类别：
 
因、果、证。
 
 
就是原因上的问题，有以下三个：
 
可疑调查
 
样本不足
 
结论无据
 
 
就是结论上的问题，有以下两个：
 
无因果联系
 
二者择一
 
 
就是论证过程上的问题，有以下两个技术服务合同，纵向横向各一个少妇风韵：
 
错误类比(横向)
 
时地全等(纵向)
 
这样，只要记住了三字诀：因、果、证教师入党积极分子个人思想汇报，就很容易记牢全部GMAT七宗罪了。
 
 
GMAT备考七宗罪 
 
顺便分析一下本月JJ的一篇AA：
 
“Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a
pharmacy section to our
grocery store. Clearly, the customer’s main concern is the convenience
afforded by one-stop
shopping. // 无因果联系，可能另有他因。 The surest way to increase our profits over the
next couple
of years, therefore, is to add a clothing department along with an automotive
supplies and repair
shop. We should also plan to continue adding new departments and services,
such as a restaurant
and a garden shop, in subsequent years. // 时地全等 Being the only store in the
area that offers such a range of services will give us a competitive advantage
over other local stores.” // 结论无据
 
附：GMAT七宗罪
 
GMAT第一宗罪小学班级工作总结：无因果联系
 
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the
reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible
for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to
establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not
necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless
other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For
example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
 
GMAT第二宗罪样本不足 Insufficient-sample
 
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion
drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general
conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a
good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is
representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such
limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
 
GMAT第三宗罪: 错误类比 (based on a false analogy ) 横向
 
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all
respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison
between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A...,
however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
 
GMAT第四宗罪时地全等 all things are equal 纵向
 
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that
happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The
author assumes without justification that the background conditions have
remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is
not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as
they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
 
GMAT第五宗罪二者择一 Either-Or choice
 
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and
there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for
imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and
BB might produce better results.
 
GMAT第六宗罪可疑调查 survey is doubtful
 
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does
not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the
poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and
the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the
results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the
conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no
evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these
questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for
the conclusion.
 
GMAT第七宗罪结论无据 gratuitous assumption
 
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no
evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is
not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore,
this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
 
记牢因、果、证，GMAT七宗罪再也不忘。
 
版权声明：

本文转载自GMAT备考，如原作者如不愿意本网站刊登使用相关素材乙肝表面抗体阳性是什么意思，请及时通知本站，我们将在最短时间内予以处理，联系010-57277590。