Board logo

标题: the owner [打印本页]

作者: 规范和体育好    时间: 2014-10-24 10:07     标题: the owner

?
WASHINGTON reporter Jiang Zheng, intern Li Rong, Pan Yanhua reports: residential building here has started the installation of elevators,basket nike air max 90 pas cher, the lower side of the owners of the approval permit Guangzhou Urban Planning Bureau to court, the plaintiff Liu Xueji or to retrofit old buildings Elevator GaoGuan first. Yesterday, the owner, who lives in the first floor of the moon Road in Yuexiu District of Guangzhou  a paper petition, the installation of the elevator project approval party --- Guangzhou Urban Planning Bureau appealed to the Yuexiu District People's Court. The case in the Court of First Instance Yuexiu.
No. 58 Moon Road Liu Xueji mentioned,http://www.lvxpower.com/news/html/?372148.html, 60 are eight buildings. "The owners of the two buildings are mostly over 80 years old", No. 58 × layer Household old retired driver Master Lin said, because the floor without an elevator, down stairs inconvenient,outlet woolrich milano,http://lt.ftltz.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=441593, often out of a door light on the stairs panting. Sick elderly people travel more inconvenient.
In order to facilitate and down,outlet woolrich italia, last August 26, the owners submitted on behalf of two buildings to construct an elevator in their dormitory application to the City Planning Board, and in between last October 16 to October 25 before the grant date of the public notice . During the announcement, the City Planning Bureau received a letter  and other three families opposed to the lower of the owners. In order to coordinate the contradiction, the Planning Board on December 4 last year before the grant of the special public hearing, but have not yet reached a consensus. January 20 this year,airmaxpascher, the owners' representative submitted a plan to the City Planning Board optimizing application "construction project planning license" again. February 26, City Planning Bureau issued to the two buildings of the "construction project planning license" (Spike planning and construction permit No. 568 [2009]).
Yesterday's trial, the plaintiff asked the judge to order the revocation of Liu Xueji this "unreasonable" and "construction project planning permit," and during the proceedings to stop the installation of elevators in all construction behavior. "No. 58,cadriano woolrich,http://www.xuncoin.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=314630&extra=, No. 60 two buildings to install an elevator, are in addition to the original dormitory building new volume, not the 'reconstruction, reconstruction of buildings', it can not apply the" Property Law "Article 76, simply because building The total area of ??more than two-thirds of the owners thereof,giubbotti peuterey outlet, and the total number of two-thirds of the owners agree to be retrofitted! Moreover, after the installation finished elevators,http://www.nchy.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=359543, residential ventilation bad,spaccio woolrich roma, serious pollution, also in violation of the "Property Law" additions Buildings shall not impede building ventilation,basket nike air max pas cher, lighting and so forth. " said early in 2009, the original project applicant and obtained approval for a second period of the license, and not making public,http://bbs.789you.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1280210, until he found himself in the cell door" construction projects Planning Permit "copy.
City Planning Bureau said, elevator as part of the building's vertical transportation system,outlet piumini moncler, it is impossible to exist independently from the main building,air max 90 pas cher pour homme,http://830121.com/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=55&filter=typeid&typeid=169, and therefore belongs to a subsidiary of the main building was built (structures); installation of elevators works, but the building matter partial reconstruction,giacche woolrich outlet,http://117.40.237.2/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=1348&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=1735, but before the instructions, have the consent of the area and the total number of building owners account for two-thirds of households consent. Therefore, licensing does not violate the relevant provisions of the "Property Law." East and west sides additions lift position and a building from ventilation,http://www.9youu.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=38865,prezzi peuterey, lighting perspective, it will not cause adverse effects.
As for the second part of the approval, the City Planning Board approved before why no publicity on the issue of the "construction work permit," City Planning Board did not explain.
The case is under further investigation.




欢迎光临 万众海浪论坛 (http://bbs.838668.com/) Powered by Discuz! 5.5.0